Migration mode
Structured
Research, drafting, citations, and audit history are separate surfaces instead of one opaque chat stream.
Casetext shutdown
Casetext's standalone workflow moved on. Your verification record should not.
The safest response to a research-platform transition is not rushing into the next black box. Preserve the work you already have, re-check citations that matter, and adopt a workflow where every generated authority can be opened, inspected, and saved.
Last verified: June 2, 2026
Source trail
Status checked against public sources.
Date retrieved: June 2, 2026
- Thomson Reuters completed its Casetext acquisition on August 17, 2023.
- Casetext.com now redirects to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel hub.
- CoCounsel Legal is marketed as a unified legal research, analysis, drafting, document-review, and workspace-integration product.
- Casetext's November 2023 public pricing snapshot listed $90, $100, and $225 monthly single-license plans.
- Mata v. Avianca imposed a $5,000 Rule 11 sanction after fake AI-generated cases were filed.
What changes for the solo workflow
Question
CiteCanon answer
Why it matters
What should I do first?
Save and classify old research by matter, jurisdiction, and reuse risk.
The material most likely to be reused deserves citation checks before it becomes client-facing work again.
What should I not do?
Do not paste old AI text into a new brief without re-opening the authorities.
Tool transitions are exactly when unsupported citations, old pricing assumptions, and stale product assumptions sneak through.
What does CiteCanon add?
A source-first research packet, hallucination detector, citation checker, and audit trail shape.
The goal is a migration path that improves risk posture instead of merely replacing a subscription.
Risk posture
Reviewed
Every important output should preserve source links and attorney-review checkpoints.
Beta policy
Open
Core features are free now so users can pressure-test the workflow quickly.