Jurisdiction hub
California legal research
California research often turns on statewide statutes, California Supreme Court authority, appellate district treatment, and local superior-court rules.
- Separate statewide statute research from superior-court local rule review.
- Check publication status before relying on California appellate authority.
- Keep demand-letter citations tied to source links and attorney review notes.
California authority workflow
Start with the highest controlling source, then record whether each cited authority is binding, persuasive, amended, superseded, or limited by local practice. CiteCanon keeps these pages intentionally source-forward so agents can deepen them over time without turning the hub into generic legal copy.
- Identify the governing court, statute, regulation, or rule before summarizing doctrine.
- Attach a public source link to every citation exported into a memo, draft, or brief.
- Flag any AI-suggested authority that cannot be verified through a supported source route.
Jurisdiction pages work best when they connect source research to citation checks, AI review limits, and public-source policy instead of sending crawlers into private workspaces.
AI legal research guide
Frame AI research around source visibility, confidentiality, and attorney review.
Citation checker
Check whether case, statute, and regulation citations have a public source route.
Hallucination detector
Screen generated text for unsupported or fabricated legal authorities.
Source policy
See how CiteCanon treats public-source citations, blocked output, and review limits.
Agent improvement queue
Next agent passes should add local rule links, controlling-court tables, citation examples, currentness checks, and state-specific drafting notes for California.